|
In
my job, I can be creative, but I have to listen
to my boss. Anyone who is receiving a paycheck
from an employer is obligated to do what his
employer requests in the normal course of
business. (And before we get off into some
extreme example, I mean something within the
normal scope of the job - not something illegal
or immoral). If Jason doesn't have the mental
discipline to listen to his coach, then he
is not a valuable and contributing employee/player/coworker/teammate
(pick one).
If
Jason becomes the top point guard in the NBA
in 2 or 3 years, then good for him and his
team. It obviously wasn't going to ever happen
for him here, regardless of the reason. That's
a shame, because he should have realized his
supporting cast here is second to none.
Mike
Bibby now has that opportunity, and I believe
we will see better overall play, more overall
wins, more team assists and more consistently
better overall stats from him than we had
before. Jason was a game changer.. sometimes
positive and sometimes negative - in just
about equal doses.
When
Chris Webber was traded from Golden State,
he deserved it - because he was at lagerheads
with Don Nelson - and he (CWebb) almost single-handedly
brought the future of that franchise down.
He wouldn't listen to his coach and was this
young punk who thought he knew more than a
veteran, winning coach. He was ok in Washington,
but still had problems - and in Sacramento
has played his very best ball for the last
few years.
Why?
Maturity?
Growth? Mental Awareness? It doesn't matter,
it is just a fact that Sacramento was the
better situation for Chris' game. Jason may
find that Memphis is the type of environment
where his skills are utilized better under
that coach and those teammates.. The NBA is
full of stories, like Scot Pollard perhaps,
where one city and situation is just "not
right" for a players skill and talent.
So all I'm saying is, two things:
1.
Jason would have NEVER flourished here with
this system, team, coach & staff.
2. The Kings made the right choice in moving
him instead of changing coaches for him or
anything else in the rest of their system.
jdawg
The
goal of any trade is to improve the team's
talent. If Bibby turns out to be an improvement
over Williams then the trade was successful.
No
one should be expecting Bibby to "take
this team to another level". What Bibby
SHOULD be expected to do is to get the team
into its offense every time down the floor,
create better looks for guys, make good decisions
and hit open jumpers. In no way is he going
to be the "star" of the team, and
thus the onus is NOT on him to carry the Kings.
Bibby
should be expected to be a facilitator, not
a savior. As for his defense, its awful. Part
of the reason I'm not riding high on the Bibby
bandwagon. But considering that JWill was
the worst defensive PG in the NBA, Mike will
be an improvement by default. However I still
believe (and in some ways hope) that we may
still see Bobby Jackson closing out some games
depending on matchups.
I
suppose if the Kings don't get to the WCF
then resigning CWebb was a failure too . Sorry
for the sarcasm but you can't look at this
deal in such black and white terms. Did the
Kings get a better PG out of the trade? We'll
have to see, but THAT'S how the deal should
be judged.
|